An Analytical Study of Motivation Theories and Managerial Practices in Organizational Contexts

By Ahmad Fuad
​​
Introduction

​Managing motivation levels within an organization has never been an easy task. Employees may appear outwardly motivated; however, in reality, they may be inwardly demotivated. In contrast, some employees might seem ineffective or incompetent, but in fact, they are highly motivated and display positive attitudes with increased levels of enthusiasm. Possessing the knowledge to assess and diagnose motivation is essential for creating an efficient and productive work environment.

Levels of Motivation for Individuals and Teams in the Workplace

There are several benefits associated with having a motivated team within an organization. High levels of motivation can positively influence individuals. Indeed, where motivation is strong, success tends to follow, and employees demonstrate a willingness to give their best effort. Increased motivation enhances employee engagement — an aspect that has attracted the attention of many employers who seek to sustain it.

As confirmed by Yuriev, Boiral, Francoeur, and Paillé (2018), high motivation leads to better productivity, allowing employers to ensure that employees remain aligned with organizational goals. Moreover, motivated individuals are less likely to be absent from work due to the personal commitment they have developed. Such individuals also serve as ambassadors for the organization, contributing to a stronger reputation and an expanded client base (Steinbauer, Renn, Chen, & Rhew, 2018).

Furthermore, motivated employees tend to improve the quality of the organization’s products and services. This is particularly evident in customer service roles, where motivation directly impacts client satisfaction. Conversely, demotivated employees are more likely to exhibit higher absenteeism and turnover rates due to dissatisfaction with their workplace.

When examining teams, motivation serves as a key factor in attracting and retaining talent within an organization. Motivating groups of employees fosters better working environments (Moon, Youn, Hur, & Kim, 2018). Motivated teams are typically more productive than unmotivated ones because they collaborate effectively toward achieving organizational objectives.

However, leaders must recognize that teams consist of individuals with diverse needs and motivational drivers. Therefore, it is essential to understand what specifically motivates each member. Motivated teams collaborate efficiently, brainstorm collectively, and generate innovative solutions that lead to better outcomes. In contrast, less motivated teams may complete their tasks individually, which often results in delays and inefficiencies.

Motivated teams are also more likely to seek guidance and feedback from one another during projects, leading to cost and time savings by reducing reliance on external consultants. Conversely, unmotivated employees may escalate minor issues to managers, resulting in wasted time and increased operational costs.

Theories and Strategies for Sustaining Motivation within an Organization

Several motivational theories guide organizations in maintaining and enhancing motivation. One of the most influential is Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, which identifies the stages of human motivation. According to Maslow, individuals must satisfy lower-level needs before progressing to higher ones. If basic needs remain unmet, higher-level aspirations become irrelevant.
​
The basic needs include physiological needs such as food, water, and shelter. Once these are fulfilled, individuals seek safety needs, followed by social needs, reflecting the desire to form meaningful relationships. The next need is self-esteem, which is followed by self-actualization, representing the pursuit of personal growth and fulfillment, as shown below.

The ERG theory categorizes human needs into three groups: existence, relatedness, and growth. Existence corresponds to the physiological and safety needs described in Maslow’s theory, while relatedness reflects an individual’s social and interpersonal needs. Growth represents the higher-level needs of self-esteem and self-actualization.
​
Unlike Maslow’s hierarchy, the ERG theory allows individuals to move between levels—progressing or regressing—depending on their level of satisfaction or frustration with a particular need. This flexibility implies that managers should recognize and address all categories of employee needs if they wish to sustain motivation effectively.

Motivation Strategies in Organizations

There are several strategies that organizations can implement to sustain motivation among employees. Positive feedback is one effective approach, as it helps employees feel valued in their daily activities (Ristic, Selakovic, & Qureshi, 2017). In addition, employees should be praised for exceptional performance in their respective roles, as this fosters a more enjoyable and motivating work environment.

Van Staden and Ellis (2017) confirm that organizations should establish employee recognition programs, including financial incentives for outstanding performance. Such initiatives can significantly enhance productivity and contribute to the overall success of the organization.

The Role of the Middle Manager in Maintaining Workplace Motivation

Managers play a crucial role in sustaining motivation within the organization. They must identify various ways to inspire their workforce, ensuring both job satisfaction and overall productivity. While managers cannot force employees to succeed, they can motivate them through appropriate incentives, fair treatment, and adequate compensation. Effective managers lead by example, inspiring their teams to perform at their best.

Jacobs, Johnson, and Hassell (2018) emphasize that managers must align organizational goals with the personal goals of individual employees. Achieving this alignment requires strategic communication and planning, as managers need to clearly outline expectations and performance standards. Without clear goals, managers may become frustrated with low productivity, while employees may feel uncertain, leading to disappointment and reduced morale.

Gillet, Fouquereau, Vallerand, Abraham, and Colombat (2018) highlight the importance of understanding what motivates each employee. Some individuals are driven by financial rewards and incentives, while others are motivated by recognition or work-life balance. Managers should conduct regular employee motivation assessments and hold individual meetings to discuss work-related challenges and motivational needs. Employees often appreciate when managers demonstrate genuine interest in their personal and professional growth.

Leading by example is another essential motivational strategy. When managers display discipline, respect, and professionalism, employees are likely to emulate these behaviors. Conversely, managers who exhibit laziness, temper issues, or procrastination often foster similar attitudes within their teams. Therefore, it is crucial that managers act as role models—showing respect, offering praise, and maintaining positive communication with all employees.

Lastly, fairness is a fundamental motivator in any workplace. Anicich and Hirsh (2017) note that equitable treatment and transparent systems are critical to maintaining motivation. Managers should develop fair incentive and reward systems that recognize performance objectively, avoid favoritism, and ensure consistent evaluation standards. Creating an equitable work environment promotes trust and sustained motivation among employees.

Conclusion

Motivating individuals and teams should be a primary objective for all organizational leaders. Motivation is a vital aspect of workplace success, as it drives improved employee performance and, consequently, enhances both the company’s operational efficiency and financial outcomes. Sustaining motivation requires continuous effort and strategic attention.

Ultimately, motivation is not solely the responsibility of employees—it is a core organizational function. The key to an effective motivational strategy lies in offering incentives and recognition tailored to employees’ individual needs and personalities. Managers must therefore understand what drives their workforce and act accordingly to build a productive, engaged, and motivated organizational culture.

​
Reference List 
​

• Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4(2), 142–175.*
  
• Anicich, E. M., & Hirsh, J. B. (2017). The psychology of middle power: Vertical code-switching, role conflict, and behavioral inhibition. Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 659–682.*
  
• Gillet, N., Fouquereau, E., Vallerand, R. J., Abraham, J., & Colombat, P. (2018). The role of workers’ motivational profiles in effective and organizational factors. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(4), 1151–1174.*
  
• Jacobs, S., Johnson, S., & Hassell, K. (2018). Managing workplace stress in community pharmacy organisations: Lessons from a review of the wider stress management and prevention literature. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 26(4), 356–365.*
  
• Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.*
  
• Moon, T. W., Youn, N., Hur, W. M., & Kim, K. M. (2018). Does employees’ spirituality enhance job performance? The mediating roles of intrinsic motivation and job crafting. Current Psychology, 37(2), 366–380.*
  
• Ristic, M. R., Selakovic, M., & Qureshi, T. M. (2017). Employee motivation strategies and the creation of a supportive work environment in societies of post-socialist transformation. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 15(1), 176–187.*
  
• Steinbauer, R., Renn, R. W., Chen, H. S., & Rhew, N. (2018). Workplace ostracism, self-regulation, and job performance: The moderating role of intrinsic work motivation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(6), 767–783.*
  
• Van Staden, L. J., & Ellis, S. (2017). Some variables influencing academic achievement: Reading, motivation, learning strategies, learning approaches. Journal of Educational Studies, 16(1), 37–51.*
  
• Yuriev, A., Boiral, O., Francoeur, V., & Paillé, P. (2018). Overcoming the barriers to pro-environmental behaviors in the workplace: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 379–394.*